The South African Council for Educator’s lenient sentences for educators who are found guilty.

This matter involves a challenge by the Centre for Child Law and two parents in two separate decisions taken by the South African Council of Educators (SACE) to give educators extremely and overly lenient sentences for assaulting children. The Centre for Child Law, represented by Section27, seeks to review the respective decisions as well as ensure that sanctions imposed by SACE pay regard to:

(i) the need for corrective and rehabilitative sanctions,

(ii) the need for mandatory removal from the educators roll in cases of serious assault,

(iii) the need to recognise children’s best interests, and

(iv) the need for a child-centred approach to disciplinary proceedings.

Equal Education Law Centre represents the Children’s Institute. The Children’s Institute has made an application to enter the matter as an amicus curiae. Children’s Institute hopes to bring to the court’s attention the prevalence of corporal punishment in schools, the negative effect that corporal punishment has on children, and to provide guidance on alternative methods of discipline in the classroom that have been proven to work.

RESOURCES

Children’s Institute Amicus Application (Part 1)

Children’s Institute Amicus Application (Part 2)

Children’s Institute Amicus Application (Part 3)

Children’s Institute Amicus Application (Part 4)

Children’s Institute Amicus Application (Part 5)

Annexure KQ 1

Annexure KQ 2

Annexure KQ 3

Annexure KQ 4

Annexure KQ 5

Annexure KQ 6

Karen Quail Expert Affidavit

SACE Answering Affidavit

Children’s Institute Replying Affidavit

Facebook